Olivia Gadecki vs Moyuka Uchijima — Singapore Round of 32

Singapore · WTA · Round of 32
AUS
Olivia Gadecki
#251WTA
1569ELO
1539Hard ELO
24 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
JPN8
Moyuka Uchijima
#108WTA
1681ELO
1633Hard ELO
24 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLLL
Gadecki O.
6-1 6-7 6-2
Uchijima M.
Gadecki O.
66162
Uchijima M.
17721

Olivia Gadecki defeated Moyuka Uchijima 6-1 6-7 6-2 in the Singapore round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Moyuka Uchijima came in ranked #108.

Key context

  • Match story: Olivia Gadecki came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gadecki O.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Uchijima M.

Uchijima M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gadecki O.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gadecki O.Uchijima M.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
8

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gadecki O.Uchijima M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
52%
53%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gadecki O.Uchijima M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
45
71
Break points saved·Slight edge
59
66
Break points won·Dominant
47
91
Deciding sets·Even
77
78
Tiebreaks·
—
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gadecki O.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Uchijima M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1539
Surface ELO
6.5+94 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1569
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1681
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.2
Surface form
2.1
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Li A.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Li A.
Kalinskaya A.[1]
7-621-0
Mertens E.[2]
Wang X.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Birrell K.
7-627-64
Mertens E.[2]
Osorio C.[6]
6-46-2
Wang X.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-757-656-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Sawangkaew M.
6-34-66-0
R16
Birrell K.
Baptiste H.
6-736-37-5
Sawangkaew M.
Bucsa C.
6-46-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Waltert S.
6-27-63
Li A.
Timofeeva M.
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Salkova D.
3-66-26-4
Mertens E.[2]
Maria T.
6-736-36-1
Wang X.[4]
Joint M.
6-46-2
Teichmann J.
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
R32
Timofeeva M.
Wang X.
6-37-63
Wang X.[4]
Marino R.
6-45-77-5
Salkova D.
Andreeva E.
7-656-2
Birrell K.
Kudermetova P.[5]
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Pera B.
6-16-706-3
Bucsa C.
Raducanu E.[7]
5-77-57-5
Maria T.
Starodubtseva Y.
2-66-16-2
Sawangkaew M.
Wei S.
6-47-62
Li A.
Saville D.
6-36-1
Teichmann J.
Dart H.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Parks A.
4-66-17-5
Mertens E.[2]
Townsend T.
6-16-0
Waltert S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Dolehide C.
6-44-66-2
Baptiste H.
Zarazua R.
2-66-06-3
Gadecki O.
Uchijima M.[8]
6-16-716-2