Jil Teichmann vs Olivia Gadecki — Singapore Round of 16

Singapore · WTA · Round of 16
Jil Teichmann
SUI
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1631Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
AUS
Olivia Gadecki
#251WTA
1569ELO
1539Hard ELO
24 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
Teichmann J.
6-4 6-4
Gadecki O.
Teichmann J.
662
Gadecki O.
440

Jil Teichmann defeated Olivia Gadecki 6-4 6-4 in the Singapore round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jil Teichmann came in ranked #119.

Key context

  • Match story: Jil Teichmann edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Teichmann J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gadecki O.

Gadecki O.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Teichmann J.Gadecki O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
53%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
5.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Teichmann J.Gadecki O.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
50
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
59
Break points won·Dominant
84
47
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
77
Tiebreaks·
90
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Teichmann J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gadecki O.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+92 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1539
5.6Overall Elo 1687
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1569
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
4.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Teichmann J.Gadecki O.
Freshness·
100
—

Teichmann J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Li A.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Li A.
Kalinskaya A.[1]
7-621-0
Mertens E.[2]
Wang X.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Li A.
Birrell K.
7-627-64
Mertens E.[2]
Osorio C.[6]
6-46-2
Wang X.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-757-656-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Sawangkaew M.
6-34-66-0
R16
Birrell K.
Baptiste H.
6-736-37-5
Sawangkaew M.
Bucsa C.
6-46-4
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Waltert S.
6-27-63
Li A.
Timofeeva M.
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Salkova D.
3-66-26-4
Mertens E.[2]
Maria T.
6-736-36-1
Wang X.[4]
Joint M.
6-46-2
Teichmann J.
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
R32
Timofeeva M.
Wang X.
6-37-63
Wang X.[4]
Marino R.
6-45-77-5
Salkova D.
Andreeva E.
7-656-2
Birrell K.
Kudermetova P.[5]
6-36-2
Osorio C.[6]
Pera B.
6-16-706-3
Bucsa C.
Raducanu E.[7]
5-77-57-5
Maria T.
Starodubtseva Y.
2-66-16-2
Sawangkaew M.
Wei S.
6-47-62
Li A.
Saville D.
6-36-1
Teichmann J.
Dart H.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Parks A.
4-66-17-5
Mertens E.[2]
Townsend T.
6-16-0
Waltert S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-3
Kalinskaya A.[1]
Dolehide C.
6-44-66-2
Baptiste H.
Zarazua R.
2-66-06-3
Gadecki O.
Uchijima M.[8]
6-16-716-2