Eva Vedder vs Hanna Chang — W75 Rome GA Semi-final

W75 Rome GA · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
NED
Eva Vedder
#179WTA
1537ELO
1527Hard ELO
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
USA
Hanna Chang
#325WTA
1354ELO
1314Hard ELO
28 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
Vedder E.
6-2 3-0
Chang H.
Vedder E.
632
Chang H.
20–

Eva Vedder advanced when Hanna Chang retired 6-2 3-0 in the W75 Rome GA semi-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vedder E.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Chang H.

Chang H.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Vedder E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vedder E.Chang H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
44%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vedder E.Chang H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
0
Break points saved·Dominant
73
15
Break points won·Slight edge
72
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
13
Tiebreaks·
—
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vedder E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Chang H.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+212 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1314
6.1Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1354
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Draw

Final
Mboko V.
Vedder E.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Mboko V.
Brace C.
6-36-4
Vedder E.
Chang H.
6-23-0
Quarter-finals
Mboko V.
Cross K.
6-06-0
Vedder E.
Osuigwe W.
6-36-4
Brace C.
Zaar L.
3-66-47-62
Chang H.
Arango E.
3-66-26-4
R16
Brace C.
Zhao C.
6-12-0
Vedder E.
Pieri T.
6-46-3
Chang H.
Karatancheva L.
6-36-3
Zaar L.
Sierra S.
0-66-46-2
Cross K.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-37-5
Mboko V.
Urhobo A.
6-26-1
Osuigwe W.
Sieg M.
6-16-4
Arango E.
Hu V.
6-36-2
R32
Cross K.
Mcnally C.
4-0
Urhobo A.
Rapolu M.
7-53-66-2
Osuigwe W.
Mateas M.
6-27-5
Vedder E.
Chirico L.
6-46-0
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Cakarevic S.
6-36-1
Sieg M.
Lee G.
6-44-66-4
Hu V.
Makarova E.
6-36-737-64
Arango E.
Hewitt D.
6-06-2
Zhao C.
Chang S.
7-646-4