Bernard Tomic vs Charles Broom — Brisbane 1 CH Round of 32

Brisbane 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS8
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 January 2025
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Tomic B.
6-1 0-6 7-6
Broom C.
Tomic B.
60772
Broom C.
16631

Bernard Tomic defeated Charles Broom 6-1 0-6 7-6 in the Brisbane 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 0–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
6.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
10
Break points saved·Dominant
92
56
Break points won·Even
4
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Broom C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+45 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1396
5.8Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
2.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Broom C.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
77

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[5]
Gengel M.
7-637-64
Semi-finals
Gengel M.
Jasika O.[6]
7-646-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Walton A.[2]
4-66-37-65
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[5]
Bolt A.[4]
6-37-5
Walton A.[2]
Tomic B.[8]
6-47-5
Gengel M.
Ellis B.
6-43-67-5
Jasika O.[6]
Mccabe J.
6-776-27-5
R16
Mccabe J.
Hijikata R.[1]
6-47-5
Jasika O.[6]
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Gengel M.
Shimizu Y.[7]
3-66-46-0
Bolt A.[4]
Nanda G.
4-67-687-64
Tomic B.[8]
Kubler J.
6-36-767-63
Schoolkate T.[5]
Dellavedova M.
6-27-66
Ellis B.
Marinkov P.
6-47-5
Walton A.[2]
Hazawa S.
6-46-3
R32
Hazawa S.
Isomura K.
6-41-0
Dellavedova M.
Sweeny D.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Langmo C.
Marchenko I.
6-46-3
Nanda G.
Janvier M.
1-67-667-5
Tomic B.[8]
Broom C.
6-10-67-63
Schoolkate T.[5]
Zhou Y.
7-56-3
Marinkov P.
Brumm J.
6-34-66-2
Mccabe J.
Bouzige M.
6-17-64
Bolt A.[4]
Hulme M.
7-56-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Jones H.
6-736-46-0
Walton A.[2]
Ilagan A.
6-26-4
Jasika O.[6]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1
Gengel M.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-3
Ellis B.
Tu L.[3]
7-636-4
Shimizu Y.[7]
Imamura M.
6-46-4