Brandon Holt vs Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul — Nonthaburi 3 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 January 2025
hard
THA
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
#965ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Holt B.
6-3 6-3
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Holt B.
662
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
330

Brandon Holt defeated Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul 6-3 6-3 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving92% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Trongcharoenchaikul W.

Trongcharoenchaikul W.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Trongcharoenchaikul W.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
53%
41%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
30%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Even
5.5
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
12
Break points saved·Dominant
85
43
Break points won·Dominant
31
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
52
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Holt B.
Kopriva V.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.[1]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Tabur C.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.
Grenier H.[2]
7-56-4
Holt B.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-776-36-4
Kopriva V.[1]
Svrcina D.
6-06-1
Cassone M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-1
R16
Svrcina D.
Squire H.[7]
6-46-746-1
Holt B.
Wong C.[6]
6-46-1
Cassone M.
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Tabur C.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-26-4
Arnaboldi F.
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-646-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Wu T.
6-47-64
Grenier H.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-46-4
R32
Grenier H.[2]
Chanta T.
6-26-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Wong C.[6]
Hassan B.
7-627-64
Cassone M.
Vacherot V.[3]
6-14-67-62
Mochizuki S.[5]
Bertola R.
7-607-5
Holt B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-3
Squire H.[7]
Jones M.
7-600-0
Arnaboldi F.
Popko D.[8]
6-12-66-1
Shimabukuro S.
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-1
Shimizu Y.
Sultanov K.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Neumayer L.
3-66-46-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Hardt N.
6-46-1
Wu T.
Jianu F.
6-26-2
Svrcina D.
Couacaud E.
6-36-2
Noguchi R.
Skatov T.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-1