Brandon Holt vs Clement Tabur — Nonthaburi 3 CH Semi-final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 January 2025
hard
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Holt B.
6-2 6-4
Tabur C.
Holt B.
662
Tabur C.
240

Brandon Holt defeated Clement Tabur 6-2 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Clement Tabur came in ranked #178, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
74
Break points won·Slight edge
31
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1507
Surface ELO
5.8+66 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1607
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.2
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
5.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Tabur C.
Freshness·
—
55

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Holt B.
Kopriva V.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.[1]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Tabur C.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.
Grenier H.[2]
7-56-4
Holt B.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-776-36-4
Kopriva V.[1]
Svrcina D.
6-06-1
Cassone M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-1
R16
Svrcina D.
Squire H.[7]
6-46-746-1
Holt B.
Wong C.[6]
6-46-1
Cassone M.
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Tabur C.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-26-4
Arnaboldi F.
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-646-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Wu T.
6-47-64
Grenier H.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-46-4
R32
Grenier H.[2]
Chanta T.
6-26-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Wong C.[6]
Hassan B.
7-627-64
Cassone M.
Vacherot V.[3]
6-14-67-62
Mochizuki S.[5]
Bertola R.
7-607-5
Holt B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-3
Squire H.[7]
Jones M.
7-600-0
Arnaboldi F.
Popko D.[8]
6-12-66-1
Shimabukuro S.
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-1
Shimizu Y.
Sultanov K.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Neumayer L.
3-66-46-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Hardt N.
6-46-1
Wu T.
Jianu F.
6-26-2
Svrcina D.
Couacaud E.
6-36-2
Noguchi R.
Skatov T.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-1