Brandon Holt vs Zachary Svajda — Nonthaburi 3 CH Quarter-final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 January 2025
hard
Zachary Svajda
USA4
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
Holt B.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Svajda Z.
Holt B.
67662
Svajda Z.
79341

Brandon Holt defeated Zachary Svajda 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72. Brandon Holt extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-12Cincinnati MastersQ2hardBrandon Holt6-4 2-6 6-3
2023-07-31WashingtonQ2hardZachary Svajda7-6(3) 3-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Svajda Z.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Holt B.Svajda Z.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
12

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Svajda Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Svajda Z.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
69
Break points saved·Even
85
89
Break points won·Dominant
31
66
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
69
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Svajda Z.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1507
Surface ELO
7.3+183 Hard Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1718
3.9
H2H
6.1
5.2
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Svajda Z.
Freshness·
—
86

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Holt B.
Kopriva V.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.[1]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Tabur C.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.
Grenier H.[2]
7-56-4
Holt B.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-776-36-4
Kopriva V.[1]
Svrcina D.
6-06-1
Cassone M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-1
R16
Svrcina D.
Squire H.[7]
6-46-746-1
Holt B.
Wong C.[6]
6-46-1
Cassone M.
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Tabur C.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-26-4
Arnaboldi F.
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-646-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Wu T.
6-47-64
Grenier H.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-46-4
R32
Grenier H.[2]
Chanta T.
6-26-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Wong C.[6]
Hassan B.
7-627-64
Cassone M.
Vacherot V.[3]
6-14-67-62
Mochizuki S.[5]
Bertola R.
7-607-5
Holt B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-3
Squire H.[7]
Jones M.
7-600-0
Arnaboldi F.
Popko D.[8]
6-12-66-1
Shimabukuro S.
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-1
Shimizu Y.
Sultanov K.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Neumayer L.
3-66-46-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Hardt N.
6-46-1
Wu T.
Jianu F.
6-26-2
Svrcina D.
Couacaud E.
6-36-2
Noguchi R.
Skatov T.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-1