Clement Tabur vs Hugo Grenier — Nonthaburi 3 CH Quarter-final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 January 2025
hard
Hugo Grenier
FRA2
Hugo Grenier
#221ATP
1548ELO
1523Hard ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Tabur C.
7-5 6-4
Grenier H.
Tabur C.
762
Grenier H.
540

Clement Tabur defeated Hugo Grenier 7-5 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Clement Tabur came in ranked #178, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Grenier H.

Grenier H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Grenier H.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
7.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Grenier H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
30
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
86
Break points won·Clear edge
23
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
65
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
45
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Grenier H.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+50 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1523
5.4Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1548
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Grenier H.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d) · Grenier H.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Holt B.
Kopriva V.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.[1]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Tabur C.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.
Grenier H.[2]
7-56-4
Holt B.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-776-36-4
Kopriva V.[1]
Svrcina D.
6-06-1
Cassone M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-1
R16
Svrcina D.
Squire H.[7]
6-46-746-1
Holt B.
Wong C.[6]
6-46-1
Cassone M.
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Tabur C.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-26-4
Arnaboldi F.
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-646-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Wu T.
6-47-64
Grenier H.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-46-4
R32
Grenier H.[2]
Chanta T.
6-26-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-2
Wong C.[6]
Hassan B.
7-627-64
Cassone M.
Vacherot V.[3]
6-14-67-62
Mochizuki S.[5]
Bertola R.
7-607-5
Holt B.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-3
Squire H.[7]
Jones M.
7-600-0
Arnaboldi F.
Popko D.[8]
6-12-66-1
Shimabukuro S.
Escoffier A.
2-66-26-1
Shimizu Y.
Sultanov K.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Neumayer L.
3-66-46-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Hardt N.
6-46-1
Wu T.
Jianu F.
6-26-2
Svrcina D.
Couacaud E.
6-36-2
Noguchi R.
Skatov T.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-1