Jelle Sels vs Clement Tabur — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Jelle Sels
#524ATP
1313ELO
1333Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2025
hard
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Sels J.
7-6 6-3
Tabur C.
Sels J.
7762
Tabur C.
6430

Jelle Sels defeated Clement Tabur 7-6 6-3 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jelle Sels closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sels J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sels J.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sels J.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sels J.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
15
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
74
Break points won·Clear edge
4
23
Deciding sets·Slight edge
40
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
11
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sels J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.0Hard Elo 1333
Surface ELO
8.0+240 Hard Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1313
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.7
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sels J.Tabur C.
Freshness·Dominant
100
69

Sels J.: 19 days rest · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Noguchi R.
Cui J.
7-696-2
Semi-finals
Cui J.
Sharipov M.
3-66-37-66
Noguchi R.
Cassone M.
7-56-746-3
Quarter-finals
Cassone M.
Paul J.
7-637-63
Sharipov M.
Takahashi Y.
6-34-66-2
Cui J.
Michalski D.
2-66-37-64
Noguchi R.
Jones M.
3-66-16-0
R16
Cui J.
Maestrelli F.[2]
6-46-2
Noguchi R.
Denolly C.
6-36-3
Takahashi Y.
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Cassone M.
Ilagan A.
6-26-3
Paul J.
Dalla Valle E.
6-36-4
Sharipov M.
Karatsev A.
7-625-76-4
Jones M.
Hsu Y.[1]
6-26-1
Michalski D.
Sels J.
1-66-17-61
R32
Moriya H.
Gengel M.[5]
5-1
Michalski D.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-06-4
Sharipov M.
Kolar Z.
6-36-4
Hsu Y.[1]
Isomura K.
6-26-1
Denolly C.
Sun F.[6]
7-674-66-4
Dalla Valle E.
Shiraishi H.
6-06-2
Cassone M.
Bertola R.[8]
6-46-1
Karatsev A.
Bai Y.[4]
7-52-67-62
Maestrelli F.[2]
Langmo C.
4-66-16-3
Ilagan A.
Prihodko O.
3-66-36-4
Sels J.
Tabur C.
7-646-3
Cui J.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-46-2
Takahashi Y.
Imamura M.
2-67-663-1
Jones M.
Paire B.
6-736-36-4
Noguchi R.
Chanta T.
7-56-3
Paul J.
Oberleitner N.
6-47-65