Chris Rodesch vs Ryan Nijboer — Nottingham CH Round of 32

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LUX8
Chris Rodesch
#173ATP
1622ELO
1557Grass ELO
$163kYTD
$424kCAREER
24 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2025
grass
Ryan Nijboer
NED
Ryan Nijboer
#501ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Rodesch C.
4-6 7-5 6-4
Nijboer R.
Rodesch C.
4762
Nijboer R.
6541

Chris Rodesch defeated Ryan Nijboer 4-6 7-5 6-4 in the Nottingham CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodesch C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Nijboer R.

Nijboer R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rodesch C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodesch C.Nijboer R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodesch C.Nijboer R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
0
Break points saved·Dominant
87
35
Break points won·Slight edge
5
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodesch C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Nijboer R.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rodesch C.Nijboer R.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
81

Rodesch C.: 17 days rest · Nijboer R.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Durasovic V.
Searle H.
7-663-66-1
Semi-finals
Searle H.
Brunold M.
6-26-747-64
Durasovic V.
Matusevich A.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Searle H.
Pokorny L.
6-26-4
Durasovic V.
Novak D.
6-36-726-4
Matusevich A.
Gombos N.
4-66-46-3
Brunold M.
Rodesch C.[8]
6-46-4
R16
Matusevich A.
Prizmic D.[5]
6-36-4
Pokorny L.
Karol M.
6-44-66-2
Brunold M.
Kopp S.
6-47-65
Durasovic V.
Misolic F.
6-36-2
Gombos N.
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Novak D.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-756-4
Rodesch C.[8]
Monday J.
6-47-64
Searle H.
Kuzmanov D.
7-656-2
R32
Rodesch C.[8]
Nijboer R.
4-67-56-4
Brunold M.
Gautier A.
6-36-4
Durasovic V.
Poljicak M.[6]
7-56-4
Misolic F.
Vrbensky M.
6-37-64
Prizmic D.[5]
Ivanovski K.
6-37-63
Pokorny L.
Shelbayh A.[1]
7-56-2
Brancaccio R.
Lamasine T.
6-46-2
Gombos N.
Clarke J.[3]
2-67-56-2
Searle H.
Geerts M.[7]
7-647-5
Novak D.
Butvilas E.[2]
7-636-3
Matusevich A.
Marie J.
6-36-3
Kuzmanov D.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-27-5
Monday J.
Peniston R.
2-67-56-3
Karol M.
Zahraj P.
6-47-63
Mikrut L.
Forejtek J.
6-726-36-1
Kopp S.
Mayo A.[4]
6-36-766-3