Mika Brunold vs Chris Rodesch — Nottingham CH Quarter-final

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
SUI
Mika Brunold
#408ATP
1466ELO
1433Grass ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2025
grass
LUX8
Chris Rodesch
#173ATP
1622ELO
1557Grass ELO
$163kYTD
$424kCAREER
24 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWLW
Brunold M.
6-4 6-4
Rodesch C.
Brunold M.
662
Rodesch C.
440

Mika Brunold defeated Chris Rodesch 6-4 6-4 in the Nottingham CH quarter-final on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Mika Brunold edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brunold M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rodesch C.

Rodesch C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brunold M.Rodesch C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brunold M.Rodesch C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
87
Break points won·Slight edge
15
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
92
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brunold M.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Rodesch C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.0Grass Elo 1433
Surface ELO
7.0+124 Grass Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1466
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1622
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brunold M.Rodesch C.
Freshness·
—
100

Rodesch C.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Durasovic V.
Searle H.
7-663-66-1
Semi-finals
Searle H.
Brunold M.
6-26-747-64
Durasovic V.
Matusevich A.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Searle H.
Pokorny L.
6-26-4
Durasovic V.
Novak D.
6-36-726-4
Matusevich A.
Gombos N.
4-66-46-3
Brunold M.
Rodesch C.[8]
6-46-4
R16
Matusevich A.
Prizmic D.[5]
6-36-4
Pokorny L.
Karol M.
6-44-66-2
Brunold M.
Kopp S.
6-47-65
Durasovic V.
Misolic F.
6-36-2
Gombos N.
Mikrut L.
6-46-2
Novak D.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-756-4
Rodesch C.[8]
Monday J.
6-47-64
Searle H.
Kuzmanov D.
7-656-2
R32
Rodesch C.[8]
Nijboer R.
4-67-56-4
Brunold M.
Gautier A.
6-36-4
Durasovic V.
Poljicak M.[6]
7-56-4
Misolic F.
Vrbensky M.
6-37-64
Prizmic D.[5]
Ivanovski K.
6-37-63
Pokorny L.
Shelbayh A.[1]
7-56-2
Brancaccio R.
Lamasine T.
6-46-2
Gombos N.
Clarke J.[3]
2-67-56-2
Searle H.
Geerts M.[7]
7-647-5
Novak D.
Butvilas E.[2]
7-636-3
Matusevich A.
Marie J.
6-36-3
Kuzmanov D.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-27-5
Monday J.
Peniston R.
2-67-56-3
Karol M.
Zahraj P.
6-47-63
Mikrut L.
Forejtek J.
6-726-36-1
Kopp S.
Mayo A.[4]
6-36-766-3