Nuno Borges vs Jakub Mensik — Auckland Quarter-final

Auckland · ATP · Quarter-final
Nuno Borges
POR7
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2025
hard
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#19ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
Borges N.
6-7 6-2 7-6
Mensik J.
Borges N.
646772
Mensik J.
772641

Nuno Borges defeated Jakub Mensik 6-7 6-2 7-6 in the Auckland quarter-final on hard. Nuno Borges extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-26US OpenR32hardNuno Borges6-7(5) 6-1 3-6 7-6(6) 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Borges N.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Mensik J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Borges N.Mensik J.
36
Serve
42
16
Return
51

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Borges N.Mensik J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
12.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Borges N.Mensik J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
77
88
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Clear edge
54
77
Deciding sets·Even
96
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Borges N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Mensik J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Hard Elo 1714
Surface ELO
7.5+179 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1769
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1931
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Borges N.Mensik J.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
90

Borges N.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mensik J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 23 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Monfils G.
Bergs Z.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Monfils G.
Basavareddy N.
7-656-4
Bergs Z.
Borges N.[7]
6-23-67-5
Quarter-finals
Bergs Z.
Carballes Baena R.
1-66-26-3
Basavareddy N.
Michelsen A.[8]
2-66-26-4
Borges N.[7]
Mensik J.
6-746-27-64
Monfils G.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-1
R16
Michelsen A.[8]
Sonego L.
7-636-2
Mensik J.
Shelton B.[1]
7-624-67-5
Carballes Baena R.
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-27-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Baez S.[3]
6-47-61
Borges N.[7]
Navone M.
4-67-56-4
Basavareddy N.
Tabilo A.[2]
6-45-76-4
Monfils G.
Struff J.
6-17-65
Bergs Z.
Nardi L.
6-16-4
R32
Borges N.[7]
Darderi L.
5-76-37-5
Nardi L.
Cobolli F.[6]
6-21-1
Navone M.
Mannarino A.
7-666-756-1
Michelsen A.[8]
Nagal S.
6-786-46-2
Basavareddy N.
Comesana F.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Norrie C.
6-26-3
Struff J.
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-4
Mensik J.
Carreno Busta P.
6-24-67-5
Carballes Baena R.
Altmaier D.
6-33-67-5
Monfils G.
Martinez P.
1-67-656-3
Bergs Z.
Becroft I.
6-37-5
Sonego L.
Diallo G.
7-652-67-67