Zizou Bergs vs Nuno Borges — Auckland Semi-final

Auckland · ATP · Semi-final
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2025
hard
Nuno Borges
POR7
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Bergs Z.
6-2 3-6 7-5
Borges N.
Bergs Z.
6372
Borges N.
2651

Zizou Bergs defeated Nuno Borges 6-2 3-6 7-5 in the Auckland semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Zizou Bergs extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Zizou Bergs closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-19Miami MastersR128hardZizou Bergs7-6(2) 7-5
2025-02-10MarseilleR16hardZizou Bergs6-2 6-7(5) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bergs Z.Borges N.
25
Serve
36
40
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Borges N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
69
77
Break points saved·Even
95
98
Break points won·Dominant
21
54
Deciding sets·Even
92
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Borges N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+43 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1714
6.0Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1769
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Borges N.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
96

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Borges N.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 23 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Monfils G.
Bergs Z.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Monfils G.
Basavareddy N.
7-656-4
Bergs Z.
Borges N.[7]
6-23-67-5
Quarter-finals
Bergs Z.
Carballes Baena R.
1-66-26-3
Basavareddy N.
Michelsen A.[8]
2-66-26-4
Borges N.[7]
Mensik J.
6-746-27-64
Monfils G.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-1
R16
Michelsen A.[8]
Sonego L.
7-636-2
Mensik J.
Shelton B.[1]
7-624-67-5
Carballes Baena R.
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-27-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Baez S.[3]
6-47-61
Borges N.[7]
Navone M.
4-67-56-4
Basavareddy N.
Tabilo A.[2]
6-45-76-4
Monfils G.
Struff J.
6-17-65
Bergs Z.
Nardi L.
6-16-4
R32
Borges N.[7]
Darderi L.
5-76-37-5
Nardi L.
Cobolli F.[6]
6-21-1
Navone M.
Mannarino A.
7-666-756-1
Michelsen A.[8]
Nagal S.
6-786-46-2
Basavareddy N.
Comesana F.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Norrie C.
6-26-3
Struff J.
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-4
Mensik J.
Carreno Busta P.
6-24-67-5
Carballes Baena R.
Altmaier D.
6-33-67-5
Monfils G.
Martinez P.
1-67-656-3
Bergs Z.
Becroft I.
6-37-5
Sonego L.
Diallo G.
7-652-67-67