Yoshihito Nishioka vs Li Tu — Brisbane Qualifying Round 2

Brisbane · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN1
Yoshihito Nishioka
#177ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 December 2024
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Nishioka Y.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Tu L.
Nishioka Y.
6262
Tu L.
3641

Yoshihito Nishioka defeated Li Tu 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Brisbane qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nishioka Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nishioka Y.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (99 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nishioka Y.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
84
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
82
Break points won·Dominant
59
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nishioka Y.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Tu L.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.1+188 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1471
7.0Overall Elo 1689
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Country comfort
6.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
27°CDrizzle
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 64%
Q2
Machac T.[1]
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[9]
Barrere G.[2]
6-17-62
Michelsen A.[4]
Schwartzman D.[8]
6-16-4
Tu L.
Galan D.[3]
6-37-65
Thiem D.[5]
Zeppieri G.[12]
3-66-46-4
Klein L.
Cressy M.[11]
4-67-686-4
Basavareddy N.[12]
Pouille L.[6]
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Tu L.
6-32-66-4
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Gasquet R.[9]
7-646-3
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
3-1
Gomez F.[11]
Lajovic D.[3]
6-17-64
Q1
Barrere G.[2]
Sweeny D.
6-36-0
Galan D.[3]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-3
Cressy M.[11]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.[12]
Jasika O.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[9]
Sekulic P.
7-656-4
Thiem D.[5]
Mccabe J.
2-67-646-4
Tu L.
Comesana F.[10]
7-615-77-63
Schwartzman D.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Gaio F.
7-656-2
Klein L.
Halys Q.[6]
6-47-61
Machac T.[1]
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.[7]
Collarini A.
6-26-4
Gomez F.[11]
Blanchet U.
3-66-37-5
Andreev A.
Tseng C.[8]
6-43-67-65
Schoolkate T.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-46-4
Tu L.
Klein L.[10]
6-46-4
Pouille L.[6]
Kubler J.
4-66-37-66
Basavareddy N.[12]
Gojo B.
4-67-646-4
Lajovic D.[3]
Hoole C.
5-77-52-0
Gasquet R.[9]
Pham D.
6-16-2
Nishioka Y.[1]
Bolt A.
6-27-64
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Bradshaw J.
6-46-2