Li Tu vs Lukas Klein — Brisbane Qualifying Round 1

Brisbane · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 December 2024
hard
Lukas Klein
SVK10
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1535Hard ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Tu L.
6-4 6-4
Klein L.
Tu L.
662
Klein L.
440

Li Tu defeated Lukas Klein 6-4 6-4 in the Brisbane qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Klein L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
92
Break points won·Slight edge
8
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Klein L.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
5.6+64 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1601
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Country comfort
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
27°CDrizzle
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 64%
Q2
Machac T.[1]
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[9]
Barrere G.[2]
6-17-62
Michelsen A.[4]
Schwartzman D.[8]
6-16-4
Tu L.
Galan D.[3]
6-37-65
Thiem D.[5]
Zeppieri G.[12]
3-66-46-4
Klein L.
Cressy M.[11]
4-67-686-4
Basavareddy N.[12]
Pouille L.[6]
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Tu L.
6-32-66-4
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Gasquet R.[9]
7-646-3
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
3-1
Gomez F.[11]
Lajovic D.[3]
6-17-64
Q1
Barrere G.[2]
Sweeny D.
6-36-0
Galan D.[3]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-3
Cressy M.[11]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.[12]
Jasika O.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[9]
Sekulic P.
7-656-4
Thiem D.[5]
Mccabe J.
2-67-646-4
Tu L.
Comesana F.[10]
7-615-77-63
Schwartzman D.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Gaio F.
7-656-2
Klein L.
Halys Q.[6]
6-47-61
Machac T.[1]
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.[7]
Collarini A.
6-26-4
Gomez F.[11]
Blanchet U.
3-66-37-5
Andreev A.
Tseng C.[8]
6-43-67-65
Schoolkate T.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-46-4
Tu L.
Klein L.[10]
6-46-4
Pouille L.[6]
Kubler J.
4-66-37-66
Basavareddy N.[12]
Gojo B.
4-67-646-4
Lajovic D.[3]
Hoole C.
5-77-52-0
Gasquet R.[9]
Pham D.
6-16-2
Nishioka Y.[1]
Bolt A.
6-27-64
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Bradshaw J.
6-46-2