Taisei Ichikawa vs Liam Branger — Noumea CH Round of 32

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Taisei Ichikawa
#799ATP
25 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 December 2024
hard
FRA
Liam Branger
#1156ATP
25 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WW
Ichikawa T.
6-4 2-6 6-2
Branger L.
Ichikawa T.
6262
Branger L.
4621

Taisei Ichikawa defeated Liam Branger 6-4 2-6 6-2 in the Noumea CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Taisei Ichikawa closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ichikawa T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Branger L.

Branger L.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ichikawa T.

Serve advantage — Branger L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Ichikawa T.Branger L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
68%
91%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
50%
69%
Service points won·Clear edge
61%
82%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
45%
Break points saved·Dominant
63%
100%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
7.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ichikawa T.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Branger L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-16-1
Mochizuki S.
Bouzige M.
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[5]
Mayot H.
7-657-64
Couacaud E.
Brouwer G.
3-67-666-4
Mochizuki S.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-36-3
Bouzige M.
Lestienne C.[8]
6-736-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayot H.
De Jong J.[8]
3-67-56-4
Couacaud E.
Gaston H.[3]
6-746-46-0
Brouwer G.
Gasquet R.[1]
4-66-27-5
Cazaux A.[5]
Paire B.[4]
6-26-1
Bouzige M.
Fucsovics M.[2]
6-36-3
Lestienne C.[8]
Vacherot V.[4]
6-24-67-5
Mochizuki S.
Ichikawa T.
6-36-3
Rodionov J.[6]
Couacaud E.
4-66-46-2
R16
Gaston H.[3]
Jacquet K.
6-26-4
Cazaux A.[5]
Kypson P.
3-67-676-2
Brouwer G.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
5-77-56-2
Mayot H.
Lestienne C.[2]
6-46-3
Paire B.[4]
Sinclair C.
4-66-26-2
Couacaud E.
Bouzige M.
6-37-63
Gasquet R.[1]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-27-63
De Jong J.[8]
Droguet T.
6-06-0
Rodionov J.[6]
Paire B.
6-45-76-2
Ichikawa T.
Brouwer G.[7]
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[8]
Holmgren A.
5-76-27-61
Fucsovics M.[2]
Janvier M.
6-43-66-3
Vacherot V.[4]
Taguchi R.
6-16-2
Bouzige M.
Camus C.
7-56-3
Mochizuki S.
Ilagan A.
6-756-46-2
Couacaud E.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-4
R32
Cazaux A.[5]
Marie J.
6-13-66-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Kuzmanov D.
7-643-67-63
Brouwer G.
Fancutt T.
6-37-5
Couacaud E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
Hemery C.
7-56-746-4
Mayot H.
Blanchet U.
6-26-0
Gasquet R.[1]
Marchenko I.
7-656-2
Gaston H.[3]
Chazal M.
6-717-57-64
De Jong J.[8]
Delaney J.
6-17-5
Jacquet K.
Ochi M.
6-16-2
Bouzige M.
Grenier H.
4-66-37-62
Kypson P.
Mott B.
6-37-5
Sinclair C.
Statham J.
6-726-46-4
Paire B.[4]
Blancaneaux G.
7-53-66-3
Droguet T.
Brancaccio R.
6-30-66-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Moriya H.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.
Pannu K.
4-66-46-1
Holmgren A.
Courte H.
6-16-2
Bouzige M.
Moller E.[5]
4-66-36-3
Camus C.
Ogura K.
6-26-1
Lestienne C.[8]
Delaney J.
6-36-3
Fucsovics M.[2]
Cabral F.
6-26-3
Paire B.
Sinclair C.
6-746-17-5
Ilagan A.
De Jong J.[3]
6-47-65
Taguchi R.
Vallejo A.
6-36-4
Vacherot V.[4]
Hazawa S.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Saitoh K.
6-46-4
Brouwer G.[7]
Tomic B.
6-46-1
Takahashi Y.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-36-0
Rodionov J.[6]
Bayldon B.
6-46-2
Ichikawa T.
Branger L.
6-42-66-2
Janvier M.
Matsuda R.
6-36-3