Celine Naef vs Sara Saito — Limoges 125 Round of 16

Limoges 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SUI
Celine Naef
#211WTA
1671ELO
1653Hard ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 December 2024
hard
JPN
Sara Saito
#281WTA
1393ELO
1395Hard ELO
19 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLWW
Naef C.
6-0 6-2
Saito S.
Naef C.
662
Saito S.
02–

Celine Naef defeated Sara Saito 6-0 6-2 in the Limoges 125 round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Saito S.

Saito S.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Saito S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
41%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
54%
Return points won·Even
42%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Saito S.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.4+258 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Hard Elo 1395
8.6Overall Elo 1671
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1393
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Saito S.
Freshness·
100
—

Naef C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Golubic V.
Naef C.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Golubic V.
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-621-0
Naef C.
Jacquemot E.
6-36-756-3
Quarter-finals
Naef C.
Andreeva E.
7-56-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Lepchenko V.
6-36-2
Golubic V.
Monnet C.
4-66-07-5
Jacquemot E.
Leonard M.
6-26-4
R16
Leonard M.
Korpatsch T.
7-666-1
Jacquemot E.
Zakharova A.
6-16-2
Naef C.
Saito S.
6-06-2
Parrizas Diaz N.
Tagger L.
6-16-3
Lepchenko V.
Blinkova A.
6-06-0
Monnet C.
Yastremska D.
6-46-4
Andreeva E.
Von Deichmann K.
6-32-66-3
Golubic V.
Bolkvadze M.
6-46-4
R32
Leonard M.
Janicijevic S.
6-46-3
Jacquemot E.
Tikhonova A.
6-46-4
Zakharova A.
Mansouri Y.
6-36-4
Naef C.
Dodin O.
6-36-1
Saito S.
Martic P.
6-46-3
Von Deichmann K.
Kudermetova P.
7-673-67-66
Andreeva E.
Oz I.
7-656-4
Lepchenko V.
Rouvroy M.
6-36-736-4
Blinkova A.
Ruse E.
6-46-1
Golubic V.
Makarova E.
6-46-1
Bolkvadze M.
Tig P.
6-46-1
Monnet C.
Seidel E.
6-46-4
Yastremska D.
Charaeva A.
6-46-4
Korpatsch T.
Alexandrova E.
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Teichmann J.
6-43-67-5
Tagger L.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
3-66-36-2