Renzo Olivo vs Nicolas Kicker — Temuco CH Round of 16

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 November 2024
hard
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1345Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Olivo R.
6-7 6-3 7-5
Kicker N.
Olivo R.
63672
Kicker N.
77351

Renzo Olivo defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-7 6-3 7-5 in the Temuco CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Kicker came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Renzo Olivo claimed a first win over Nicolas Kicker in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-01Buenos AiresQ1clayNicolas Kicker7-5 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
56%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
33
56
Break points won·Dominant
15
45
Deciding sets·Even
27
30
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
41
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Olivo R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kicker N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Olivo R.Kicker N.
Freshness·
—
100

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Habib H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-46-737-62
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Habib H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
2-66-27-66
Habib H.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Huertas Del Pino C.
7-53-67-65
R16
Habib H.
Soto M.
7-627-62
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-51-67-65
Prado Angelo J.
Kovacevic A.[1]
6-47-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-736-37-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Bertola R.
6-46-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Guillen Meza A.
7-626-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Midon L.
6-16-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-26-716-2
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Comesana F.[2]
6-43-1
Kovacevic A.[1]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-766-16-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.
5-76-36-4
Kicker N.
Kestelboim M.
4-66-46-2
Olivo R.
Bueno G.[7]
6-47-63
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Torres J.
6-46-2
Bertola R.
Lock B.
7-54-66-3
Soares Klier Junior G.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-56-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-16-2
Guillen Meza A.
Alves M.[8]
6-44-67-69
Dutra Da Silva D.
Ambrogi L.
7-56-3
Habib H.
Villanueva G.
7-696-2
Soto M.
Luz O.
6-14-66-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
6-47-62
Midon L.
Farjat T.
7-656-2
Dedura Palomero D.
Sakamoto P.
7-636-1