Nicolas Kicker vs Mariano Kestelboim — Temuco CH Round of 32

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1345Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 November 2024
hard
Mariano Kestelboim
ARG
Mariano Kestelboim
#692ATP
1198ELO
1171Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Kicker N.
4-6 6-4 6-2
Kestelboim M.
Kicker N.
4662
Kestelboim M.
6421

Nicolas Kicker defeated Mariano Kestelboim 4-6 6-4 6-2 in the Temuco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kestelboim M.

Kestelboim M.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Kestelboim M.
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.0
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Kestelboim M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
14
Break points saved·Dominant
56
7
Break points won·Dominant
45
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
68
Tiebreaks·
51
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kestelboim M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
7.0+175 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1171
6.9Overall Elo 1385
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1198
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Kestelboim M.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Habib H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-46-737-62
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Habib H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
2-66-27-66
Habib H.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Huertas Del Pino C.
7-53-67-65
R16
Habib H.
Soto M.
7-627-62
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-51-67-65
Prado Angelo J.
Kovacevic A.[1]
6-47-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-736-37-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Bertola R.
6-46-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Guillen Meza A.
7-626-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Midon L.
6-16-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-26-716-2
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Comesana F.[2]
6-43-1
Kovacevic A.[1]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-766-16-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.
5-76-36-4
Kicker N.
Kestelboim M.
4-66-46-2
Olivo R.
Bueno G.[7]
6-47-63
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Torres J.
6-46-2
Bertola R.
Lock B.
7-54-66-3
Soares Klier Junior G.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-56-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-16-2
Guillen Meza A.
Alves M.[8]
6-44-67-69
Dutra Da Silva D.
Ambrogi L.
7-56-3
Habib H.
Villanueva G.
7-696-2
Soto M.
Luz O.
6-14-66-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
6-47-62
Midon L.
Farjat T.
7-656-2
Dedura Palomero D.
Sakamoto P.
7-636-1