Lautaro Midon vs Tomas Farjat — Temuco CH Round of 32

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Lautaro Midon
1526ELO
1451Hard ELO
22 yrs · 180 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 November 2024
hard
ARG
Tomas Farjat
#754ATP
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
Midon L.
7-6 6-2
Farjat T.
Midon L.
7762
Farjat T.
6520

Lautaro Midon defeated Tomas Farjat 7-6 6-2 in the Temuco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Lautaro Midon closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Midon L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Farjat T.

Farjat T.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Midon L.

Serve advantage — Midon L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Midon L.Farjat T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
42%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.4
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 39). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Midon L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Farjat T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Midon L.Farjat T.
Freshness·
58
—

Midon L.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 89 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Habib H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
6-46-737-62
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Habib H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
2-66-27-66
Habib H.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Huertas Del Pino C.
7-53-67-65
R16
Habib H.
Soto M.
7-627-62
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-51-67-65
Prado Angelo J.
Kovacevic A.[1]
6-47-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-736-37-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Bertola R.
6-46-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Guillen Meza A.
7-626-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Midon L.
6-16-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-26-716-2
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Comesana F.[2]
6-43-1
Kovacevic A.[1]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-766-16-4
Prado Angelo J.
Olivieri G.
5-76-36-4
Kicker N.
Kestelboim M.
4-66-46-2
Olivo R.
Bueno G.[7]
6-47-63
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Torres J.
6-46-2
Bertola R.
Lock B.
7-54-66-3
Soares Klier Junior G.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-56-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-16-2
Guillen Meza A.
Alves M.[8]
6-44-67-69
Dutra Da Silva D.
Ambrogi L.
7-56-3
Habib H.
Villanueva G.
7-696-2
Soto M.
Luz O.
6-14-66-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
6-47-62
Midon L.
Farjat T.
7-656-2
Dedura Palomero D.
Sakamoto P.
7-636-1