Kristina Mladenovic vs Carolina Alves — Buenos Aires 125 Round of 32

Buenos Aires 125 · WTA · Round of 32
Kristina Mladenovic
FRA
Kristina Mladenovic
#841WTA
1422ELO
1371Clay ELO
33 yrs · 184 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 November 2024
clay
BRA
Carolina Alves
#348WTA
1280ELO
1265Clay ELO
30 yrs · 170 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWW
Mladenovic K.
7-6 6-1
Alves C.
Mladenovic K.
7762
Alves C.
6110

Kristina Mladenovic defeated Carolina Alves 7-6 6-1 in the Buenos Aires 125 round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Kristina Mladenovic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mladenovic K.serving48% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs Alves C.

Alves C.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mladenovic K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mladenovic K.Alves C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
59%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
40%
46%
Service points won·Even
53%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
48%
Break points saved·Even
55%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
0.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mladenovic K.Alves C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
11
Break points saved·Clear edge
26
9
Break points won·Even
69
72
Deciding sets·Slight edge
48
41
Tiebreaks·
65
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mladenovic K.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Alves C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.[4]
Kawa K.
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Kawa K.
Carle M.[3]
6-36-4
Sherif M.[4]
Bejlek S.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Sherif M.[4]
Ortenzi J.
7-665-76-4
Carle M.[3]
Riera J.[6]
6-16-0
Kawa K.
Semenistaja D.[7]
3-67-56-4
Bejlek S.
Jeanjean L.
2-66-46-0
R16
Carle M.[3]
Maristany Zuleta De Reales G.
6-06-4
Riera J.[6]
Makarova E.
6-23-66-2
Ortenzi J.
Pigossi L.[8]
6-26-2
Semenistaja D.[7]
Arango E.
6-35-76-4
Sherif M.[4]
Mladenovic K.
6-26-2
Bejlek S.
Fita Boluda A.
6-26-1
Jeanjean L.
Lamens S.[2]
4-66-46-2
Kawa K.
Udvardy P.
3-66-26-3
R32
Jeanjean L.
Jorge F.
6-46-3
Arango E.
Caffarena J.
6-06-0
Semenistaja D.[7]
Chwalinska M.
6-34-66-2
Carle M.[3]
Bosio V.
6-46-2
Maristany Zuleta De Reales G.
Shymanovich I.
6-12-66-0
Makarova E.
Bulgaru M.
3-66-47-5
Ortenzi J.
Giovannini L.
6-26-1
Fita Boluda A.
Capurro Taborda M.
4-66-36-1
Lamens S.[2]
Anderson R.
6-36-1
Sherif M.[4]
Strakhova V.
6-44-66-1
Kawa K.
Lepchenko V.[9]
2-66-26-4
Riera J.[6]
Stojanovic N.
6-46-4
Pigossi L.[8]
Fossa Huergo N.
6-46-4
Udvardy P.
Serban R.
6-17-64
Bejlek S.
Montgomery R.[5]
5-77-636-1
Mladenovic K.
Alves C.
7-616-1