Li Tu vs Coleman Wong — Yokohama CH Quarter-final

Yokohama CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS6
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
hard
HKG3
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Tu L.
6-0 6-4
Wong C.
Tu L.
662
Wong C.
040

Li Tu defeated Coleman Wong 6-0 6-4 in the Yokohama CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tu L.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
91
Break points won·Even
8
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
64
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Wong C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
7.0+122 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1602
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
5.9
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
7.6
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Wong C.
Freshness·
—
89

Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shimizu Y.
Tu L.[6]
6-746-46-2
Semi-finals
Tu L.[6]
Lestienne C.[8]
6-23-67-63
Shimizu Y.
Hassan B.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Shimizu Y.
Sakamoto R.
6-36-747-63
Lestienne C.[8]
Zakharov A.
6-46-2
Tu L.[6]
Wong C.[3]
6-06-4
Hassan B.
Mccabe J.
7-616-786-2
R16
Lestienne C.[8]
Basilashvili N.
6-34-2
Shimizu Y.
Imamura M.
6-47-64
Zakharov A.
Wu T.
6-776-27-66
Wong C.[3]
Mochizuki S.
7-626-3
Tu L.[6]
Sekulic P.
7-656-3
Sakamoto R.
Cina F.
7-56-4
Hassan B.
Svrcina D.
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Ymer E.
5-76-36-3
R32
Wong C.[3]
Jones L.
6-26-1
Sekulic P.
Blockx A.
5-1
Tu L.[6]
Demin Y.
6-13-0
Zakharov A.
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Bellucci M.[1]
4-66-46-3
Basilashvili N.
Dodig M.
6-42-66-4
Lestienne C.[8]
Negritu C.
3-67-56-4
Mochizuki S.
Nam J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto R.
Rodionov J.[7]
6-26-4
Cina F.
Den Ouden G.
6-43-66-4
Imamura M.
Sweeny D.
6-34-66-3
Shimizu Y.
Bolt A.[4]
7-666-1
Hassan B.
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-16-4
Svrcina D.
Paul J.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Jasika O.
6-35-76-4
Ymer E.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-612-67-65