Li Tu vs Constant Lestienne — Yokohama CH Semi-final

Yokohama CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUS6
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
hard
FRA8
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Tu L.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Lestienne C.
Tu L.
63772
Lestienne C.
26631

Li Tu defeated Constant Lestienne 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Yokohama CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Li Tu came in ranked #464, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Lestienne C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Lestienne C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Lestienne C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
41
Break points saved·Even
82
86
Break points won·Dominant
8
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
20
26
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
64
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lestienne C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
5.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
7.4
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Shimizu Y.
Tu L.[6]
6-746-46-2
Semi-finals
Tu L.[6]
Lestienne C.[8]
6-23-67-63
Shimizu Y.
Hassan B.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Shimizu Y.
Sakamoto R.
6-36-747-63
Lestienne C.[8]
Zakharov A.
6-46-2
Tu L.[6]
Wong C.[3]
6-06-4
Hassan B.
Mccabe J.
7-616-786-2
R16
Lestienne C.[8]
Basilashvili N.
6-34-2
Shimizu Y.
Imamura M.
6-47-64
Zakharov A.
Wu T.
6-776-27-66
Wong C.[3]
Mochizuki S.
7-626-3
Tu L.[6]
Sekulic P.
7-656-3
Sakamoto R.
Cina F.
7-56-4
Hassan B.
Svrcina D.
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Ymer E.
5-76-36-3
R32
Wong C.[3]
Jones L.
6-26-1
Sekulic P.
Blockx A.
5-1
Tu L.[6]
Demin Y.
6-13-0
Zakharov A.
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Bellucci M.[1]
4-66-46-3
Basilashvili N.
Dodig M.
6-42-66-4
Lestienne C.[8]
Negritu C.
3-67-56-4
Mochizuki S.
Nam J.
6-26-2
Sakamoto R.
Rodionov J.[7]
6-26-4
Cina F.
Den Ouden G.
6-43-66-4
Imamura M.
Sweeny D.
6-34-66-3
Shimizu Y.
Bolt A.[4]
7-666-1
Hassan B.
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-16-4
Svrcina D.
Paul J.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Jasika O.
6-35-76-4
Ymer E.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-612-67-65