Hady Habib vs Juan Pablo Paz — Sao Paulo CH Round of 32

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LIB
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1435Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
ARG
Juan Pablo Paz
#1785ATP
31 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
Habib H.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Paz J.
Habib H.
66562
Paz J.
37731

Hady Habib defeated Juan Pablo Paz 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Sao Paulo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Hady Habib closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Habib H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Paz J.

Paz J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Habib H.Paz J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.7
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Habib H.Paz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
32
Break points won·Clear edge
1
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
78
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Habib H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Paz J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[3]
Tirante T.[5]
7-54-66-4
Semi-finals
Comesana F.[3]
Soto M.
6-26-777-61
Tirante T.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[7]
7-647-5
Quarter-finals
Soto M.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Johns G.
6-36-1
Tirante T.[5]
Habib H.
7-634-66-4
R16
Soto M.
Prado Angelo J.
6-36-4
Heide G.
Kovacevic A.[1]
6-36-4
Comesana F.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-776-47-66
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Tomic B.
6-43-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Sakamoto P.
7-53-66-3
Johns G.
Kicker N.
6-36-1
Tirante T.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-4
Habib H.
Monteiro T.[2]
4-67-626-4
R32
Kicker N.
Clarke J.
6-44-66-2
Kovacevic A.[1]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-27-64
Heide G.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-1
Soto M.
Gomez F.[6]
7-57-64
Comesana F.[3]
Luz O.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.
Bertola R.
6-36-3
Tomic B.
Bueno G.
6-36-726-1
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Midon L.
6-27-5
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Alves M.
7-664-67-62
Sakamoto P.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Johns G.
Ambrogi L.
6-46-4
Tirante T.[5]
Olivo R.
6-26-2
Torres J.
Villanueva G.
7-656-4
Habib H.
Paz J.
6-36-756-3
Monteiro T.[2]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
6-36-3