Fernando Romboli vs Tomas Farjat — Sao Paulo CH Qualifying Round 1

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
BRA
Fernando Romboli
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
ARG5
Tomas Farjat
#754ATP
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
Romboli F.
6-4 7-6
Farjat T.
Romboli F.
6772
Farjat T.
4650

Fernando Romboli defeated Tomas Farjat 6-4 7-6 in the Sao Paulo CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Romboli F.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Farjat T.

Farjat T.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Romboli F.

Serve advantage — Farjat T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Romboli F.Farjat T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
42%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
39%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
7.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (7 vs 39). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Romboli F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Farjat T.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Olivo R.[1]
Leite W.[11]
6-746-36-3
Villanueva G.[2]
Escurra Isnardi H.
4-67-56-3
Paz J.[8]
Ambrogi L.[3]
6-43-66-4
Midon L.[4]
Schiessl J.[7]
3-66-16-2
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
Romboli F.
7-677-65
Johns G.[6]
Ribeiro E.[10]
6-16-3
Q1
Leite W.[11]
Wendler Filho J.
6-16-3
Villanueva G.[2]
Kohlmann De Freitas E.
7-56-3
Escurra Isnardi H.
Londero J.[12]
6-37-60
Ambrogi L.[3]
Nunez D.
6-36-2
Paz J.[8]
Gomes Leme J.
6-46-3
Midon L.[4]
Acioly L.
6-06-1
Schiessl J.[7]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-37-5
Romboli F.
Farjat T.[5]
6-47-65
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
Vilicich B.[9]
6-13-67-5
Johns G.[6]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-2
Ribeiro E.[10]
Augusto Dos Santos R.
6-43-66-4