Mats Rosenkranz vs Elmar Ejupovic — Puerto Vallarta CH Round of 32

Puerto Vallarta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
hard
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Rosenkranz M.
6-3 3-6 7-5
Ejupovic E.
Rosenkranz M.
6372
Ejupovic E.
3651

Mats Rosenkranz defeated Elmar Ejupovic 6-3 3-6 7-5 in the Puerto Vallarta CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mats Rosenkranz closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosenkranz M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Ejupovic E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosenkranz M.Ejupovic E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
70%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
8.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosenkranz M.Ejupovic E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
31
7
Break points saved·Even
86
88
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
0
Tiebreaks·Even
6
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosenkranz M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ejupovic E.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.7
Surface form
3.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Basavareddy N.[1]
Draxl L.[6]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.[1]
Alvarez L.
6-36-2
Draxl L.[6]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.[1]
Ilagan A.[7]
7-646-0
Alvarez L.
Rosenkranz M.
6-26-3
Kuzmanov D.
Brady P.
6-16-2
Draxl L.[6]
Mayo A.
6-26-4
R16
Basavareddy N.[1]
Hussey G.
7-50-66-1
Ilagan A.[7]
Magadan A.
6-06-4
Rosenkranz M.
Rodesch C.
6-12-67-66
Alvarez L.
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-36-3
Brady P.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-17-5
Kuzmanov D.
Perez A.
7-56-2
Draxl L.[6]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-06-0
Mayo A.
Smith K.
6-37-5
R32
Alvarez L.
Aboian V.[8]
7-56-1
Kuzmanov D.
Corwin F.
6-16-3
Basavareddy N.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Hussey G.
Oberleitner N.
6-26-746-0
Magadan A.
Artnak B.
6-47-64
Ilagan A.[7]
Seggerman R.
6-16-2
Rodesch C.
Pannu K.
6-33-66-3
Rosenkranz M.
Ejupovic E.
6-33-67-5
Pacheco Mendez R.
Escobedo E.
7-644-66-2
Kirchheimer S.
Searle H.
6-33-66-2
Brady P.
Ledesma S.
6-26-1
Perez A.
Engel J.
6-33-66-4
Draxl L.[6]
Karlovskiy E.
6-06-0
Hernandez Serrano J.
Purtseladze S.
6-27-5
Smith K.
Crespo Piedra R.
6-36-4
Mayo A.
Dougaz A.[2]
3-67-666-1