Lauren Davis vs Astra Sharma — Charleston 125 2 Round of 16

Charleston 125 2 · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
AUS
Astra Sharma
#597WTA
1512ELO
1496Clay ELO
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Davis L.
6-3 7-6
Sharma A.
Davis L.
6772
Sharma A.
365–

Lauren Davis defeated Astra Sharma 6-3 7-6 in the Charleston 125 2 round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Lauren Davis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lauren Davis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Lauren Davis closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-13HobartR32hardLauren Davis6-3 3-6 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Davis L.serving45% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Sharma A.

Sharma A.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Davis L.Sharma A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
50%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (39 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Davis L.Sharma A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
27
Break points saved·Dominant
26
58
Break points won·Clear edge
79
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Davis L.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sharma A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
2.3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zarazua R.
Chang H.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Zarazua R.
Davis L.
3-67-633-0
Chang H.
Brancaccio N.
7-50-66-4
Quarter-finals
Brancaccio N.
Romero Gormaz L.
6-07-64
Zarazua R.
Chirico L.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Lee G.
4-67-626-1
Chang H.
Lepchenko V.
6-42-67-5
R16
Zarazua R.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1
Chirico L.
Serban R.
6-26-3
Davis L.
Sharma A.
6-37-65
Lee G.
Jovic I.
7-656-2
Chang H.
Hovde L.
6-26-3
Lepchenko V.
Makarova E.
6-45-76-3
Romero Gormaz L.
Feistel G.
6-46-4
Brancaccio N.
Parks A.
6-16-3
R32
Zarazua R.
Charaeva A.
6-27-65
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Gorgodze E.
6-17-5
Serban R.
Bulgaru M.
3-66-36-2
Chirico L.
Bara I.
3-66-27-63
Davis L.
Udvardy P.
6-16-4
Sharma A.
Glushko L.
6-36-0
Lee G.
Cross K.
6-26-1
Jovic I.
Arconada U.
6-46-4
Chang H.
Sieg M.
6-46-3
Hovde L.
Zhao C.
6-06-1
Makarova E.
Zavatska K.
6-06-1
Lepchenko V.
Chang S.
6-37-5
Romero Gormaz L.
Fung S.
6-06-1
Feistel G.
Smith A.
5-76-26-1
Brancaccio N.
Kraus S.
6-46-4
Parks A.
Hu V.
6-26-2