Nicolas Kicker vs Jay Clarke — Sao Paulo CH Round of 32

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
GBR
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1414Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
Kicker N.
6-4 4-6 6-2
Clarke J.
Kicker N.
6462
Clarke J.
4621

Nicolas Kicker defeated Jay Clarke 6-4 4-6 6-2 in the Sao Paulo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Kicker closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
63
Break points won·Clear edge
45
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Clarke J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Clay Elo 1373
Surface ELO
5.7+41 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1385
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1458
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
2.7
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Clarke J.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[3]
Tirante T.[5]
7-54-66-4
Semi-finals
Comesana F.[3]
Soto M.
6-26-777-61
Tirante T.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[7]
7-647-5
Quarter-finals
Soto M.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Johns G.
6-36-1
Tirante T.[5]
Habib H.
7-634-66-4
R16
Soto M.
Prado Angelo J.
6-36-4
Heide G.
Kovacevic A.[1]
6-36-4
Comesana F.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-776-47-66
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Tomic B.
6-43-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Sakamoto P.
7-53-66-3
Johns G.
Kicker N.
6-36-1
Tirante T.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-4
Habib H.
Monteiro T.[2]
4-67-626-4
R32
Kicker N.
Clarke J.
6-44-66-2
Kovacevic A.[1]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-27-64
Heide G.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-1
Soto M.
Gomez F.[6]
7-57-64
Comesana F.[3]
Luz O.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.
Bertola R.
6-36-3
Tomic B.
Bueno G.
6-36-726-1
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Midon L.
6-27-5
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Alves M.
7-664-67-62
Sakamoto P.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Johns G.
Ambrogi L.
6-46-4
Tirante T.[5]
Olivo R.
6-26-2
Torres J.
Villanueva G.
7-656-4
Habib H.
Paz J.
6-36-756-3
Monteiro T.[2]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
6-36-3