Louisa Chirico vs Raluka Serban — Charleston 125 2 Round of 16

Charleston 125 2 · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Louisa Chirico
USA
Louisa Chirico
#382WTA
1476ELO
1516Clay ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
CYP
Raluka Serban
#323WTA
1356ELO
1336Clay ELO
29 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Chirico L.
6-2 6-3
Serban R.
Chirico L.
662
Serban R.
23–

Louisa Chirico defeated Raluka Serban 6-2 6-3 in the Charleston 125 2 round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chirico L.serving42% hold

wins 47% of points on serve vs Serban R.

Serban R.serving47% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs Chirico L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chirico L.Serban R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
42%
Service points won·Even
54%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Even
1.9
1.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
5.1
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chirico L.Serban R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
46
38
Break points won·Even
74
76
Deciding sets·Even
19
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chirico L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Serban R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+180 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1336
5.9Overall Elo 1476
ELO gap
4.1Overall Elo 1356
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
5.4
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zarazua R.
Chang H.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Zarazua R.
Davis L.
3-67-633-0
Chang H.
Brancaccio N.
7-50-66-4
Quarter-finals
Brancaccio N.
Romero Gormaz L.
6-07-64
Zarazua R.
Chirico L.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Lee G.
4-67-626-1
Chang H.
Lepchenko V.
6-42-67-5
R16
Zarazua R.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1
Chirico L.
Serban R.
6-26-3
Davis L.
Sharma A.
6-37-65
Lee G.
Jovic I.
7-656-2
Chang H.
Hovde L.
6-26-3
Lepchenko V.
Makarova E.
6-45-76-3
Romero Gormaz L.
Feistel G.
6-46-4
Brancaccio N.
Parks A.
6-16-3
R32
Zarazua R.
Charaeva A.
6-27-65
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Gorgodze E.
6-17-5
Serban R.
Bulgaru M.
3-66-36-2
Chirico L.
Bara I.
3-66-27-63
Davis L.
Udvardy P.
6-16-4
Sharma A.
Glushko L.
6-36-0
Lee G.
Cross K.
6-26-1
Jovic I.
Arconada U.
6-46-4
Chang H.
Sieg M.
6-46-3
Hovde L.
Zhao C.
6-06-1
Makarova E.
Zavatska K.
6-06-1
Lepchenko V.
Chang S.
6-37-5
Romero Gormaz L.
Fung S.
6-06-1
Feistel G.
Smith A.
5-76-26-1
Brancaccio N.
Kraus S.
6-46-4
Parks A.
Hu V.
6-26-2