Hanna Chang vs Madison Sieg — Charleston 125 2 Round of 32

Charleston 125 2 · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Hanna Chang
#325WTA
1354ELO
1377Clay ELO
28 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
USA
Madison Sieg
#378WTA
1237ELO
1207Clay ELO
23 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
Chang H.
6-4 6-3
Sieg M.
Chang H.
662
Sieg M.
43–

Hanna Chang defeated Madison Sieg 6-4 6-3 in the Charleston 125 2 round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Hanna Chang closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chang H.serving42% hold

wins 47% of points on serve vs Sieg M.

Sieg M.serving37% hold

wins 45% of points on serve vs Chang H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chang H.Sieg M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
55%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
51%
49%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chang H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sieg M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.6
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Chang H.Sieg M.
Freshness·
—
85

Sieg M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zarazua R.
Chang H.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Zarazua R.
Davis L.
3-67-633-0
Chang H.
Brancaccio N.
7-50-66-4
Quarter-finals
Brancaccio N.
Romero Gormaz L.
6-07-64
Zarazua R.
Chirico L.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Lee G.
4-67-626-1
Chang H.
Lepchenko V.
6-42-67-5
R16
Zarazua R.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1
Chirico L.
Serban R.
6-26-3
Davis L.
Sharma A.
6-37-65
Lee G.
Jovic I.
7-656-2
Chang H.
Hovde L.
6-26-3
Lepchenko V.
Makarova E.
6-45-76-3
Romero Gormaz L.
Feistel G.
6-46-4
Brancaccio N.
Parks A.
6-16-3
R32
Zarazua R.
Charaeva A.
6-27-65
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Gorgodze E.
6-17-5
Serban R.
Bulgaru M.
3-66-36-2
Chirico L.
Bara I.
3-66-27-63
Davis L.
Udvardy P.
6-16-4
Sharma A.
Glushko L.
6-36-0
Lee G.
Cross K.
6-26-1
Jovic I.
Arconada U.
6-46-4
Chang H.
Sieg M.
6-46-3
Hovde L.
Zhao C.
6-06-1
Makarova E.
Zavatska K.
6-06-1
Lepchenko V.
Chang S.
6-37-5
Romero Gormaz L.
Fung S.
6-06-1
Feistel G.
Smith A.
5-76-26-1
Brancaccio N.
Kraus S.
6-46-4
Parks A.
Hu V.
6-26-2