Louisa Chirico vs Irina Bara — Charleston 125 2 Round of 32

Charleston 125 2 · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Louisa Chirico
USA
Louisa Chirico
#382WTA
1476ELO
1516Clay ELO
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
ROU
Irina Bara
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLLW
Chirico L.
3-6 6-2 7-6
Bara I.
Chirico L.
36772
Bara I.
62631

Louisa Chirico defeated Irina Bara 3-6 6-2 7-6 in the Charleston 125 2 round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chirico L.serving31% hold

wins 42% of points on serve vs Bara I.

Bara I.serving35% hold

wins 44% of points on serve vs Chirico L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chirico L.Bara I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
54%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
42%
Service points won·Even
54%
51%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
49%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
0.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chirico L.Bara I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
5
Break points saved·Dominant
46
2
Break points won·Slight edge
74
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
38
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chirico L.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bara I.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zarazua R.
Chang H.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Zarazua R.
Davis L.
3-67-633-0
Chang H.
Brancaccio N.
7-50-66-4
Quarter-finals
Brancaccio N.
Romero Gormaz L.
6-07-64
Zarazua R.
Chirico L.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Lee G.
4-67-626-1
Chang H.
Lepchenko V.
6-42-67-5
R16
Zarazua R.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1
Chirico L.
Serban R.
6-26-3
Davis L.
Sharma A.
6-37-65
Lee G.
Jovic I.
7-656-2
Chang H.
Hovde L.
6-26-3
Lepchenko V.
Makarova E.
6-45-76-3
Romero Gormaz L.
Feistel G.
6-46-4
Brancaccio N.
Parks A.
6-16-3
R32
Zarazua R.
Charaeva A.
6-27-65
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Gorgodze E.
6-17-5
Serban R.
Bulgaru M.
3-66-36-2
Chirico L.
Bara I.
3-66-27-63
Davis L.
Udvardy P.
6-16-4
Sharma A.
Glushko L.
6-36-0
Lee G.
Cross K.
6-26-1
Jovic I.
Arconada U.
6-46-4
Chang H.
Sieg M.
6-46-3
Hovde L.
Zhao C.
6-06-1
Makarova E.
Zavatska K.
6-06-1
Lepchenko V.
Chang S.
6-37-5
Romero Gormaz L.
Fung S.
6-06-1
Feistel G.
Smith A.
5-76-26-1
Brancaccio N.
Kraus S.
6-46-4
Parks A.
Hu V.
6-26-2