Garrett Johns vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi — Sao Paulo CH Round of 32

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Garrett Johns
USA
Garrett Johns
#382ATP
1336ELO
1291Clay ELO
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 November 2024
clay
ARG
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
#315ATP
1392ELO
1382Clay ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Johns G.
6-4 6-4
Ambrogi L.
Johns G.
662
Ambrogi L.
440

Garrett Johns defeated Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi 6-4 6-4 in the Sao Paulo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Garrett Johns edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Johns G.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ambrogi L.

Ambrogi L.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Johns G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johns G.Ambrogi L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johns G.Ambrogi L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
2
Break points saved·Dominant
66
27
Break points won·Dominant
3
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
10
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
11
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johns G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ambrogi L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1Clay Elo 1291
Surface ELO
4.9+91 Clay Elo edge
5.6Overall Elo 1336
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1392
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.4
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
5.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Johns G.Ambrogi L.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
88

Johns G.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 76 games (7d) · Ambrogi L.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[3]
Tirante T.[5]
7-54-66-4
Semi-finals
Comesana F.[3]
Soto M.
6-26-777-61
Tirante T.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[7]
7-647-5
Quarter-finals
Soto M.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Johns G.
6-36-1
Tirante T.[5]
Habib H.
7-634-66-4
R16
Soto M.
Prado Angelo J.
6-36-4
Heide G.
Kovacevic A.[1]
6-36-4
Comesana F.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-776-47-66
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Tomic B.
6-43-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Sakamoto P.
7-53-66-3
Johns G.
Kicker N.
6-36-1
Tirante T.[5]
Torres J.
7-56-4
Habib H.
Monteiro T.[2]
4-67-626-4
R32
Kicker N.
Clarke J.
6-44-66-2
Kovacevic A.[1]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-27-64
Heide G.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-4
Prado Angelo J.
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-1
Soto M.
Gomez F.[6]
7-57-64
Comesana F.[3]
Luz O.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.
Bertola R.
6-36-3
Tomic B.
Bueno G.
6-36-726-1
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Midon L.
6-27-5
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Alves M.
7-664-67-62
Sakamoto P.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Johns G.
Ambrogi L.
6-46-4
Tirante T.[5]
Olivo R.
6-26-2
Torres J.
Villanueva G.
7-656-4
Habib H.
Paz J.
6-36-756-3
Monteiro T.[2]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
6-36-3