Ethan Quinn vs Adam Walton — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Quinn E.
6-3 6-4
Walton A.
Quinn E.
662
Walton A.
340

Ethan Quinn defeated Adam Walton 6-3 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Ethan Quinn closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Quinn E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Quinn E.Walton A.
37
Serve
35
21
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Quinn E.Walton A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
6.3
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Quinn E.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
71
65
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Even
19
20
Deciding sets·Even
98
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Quinn E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Walton A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+98 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1669
6.8Overall Elo 1804
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1703
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Quinn E.Walton A.
Freshness·Dominant
97
54

Quinn E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63