Aidan Mchugh vs Learner Tien — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Aidan Mchugh
#460ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
Learner Tien
USA3
Learner Tien
#17ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Mchugh A.
6-2 4-6 7-5
Tien L.
Mchugh A.
6472
Tien L.
2651

Aidan Mchugh defeated Learner Tien 6-2 4-6 7-5 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #17.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mchugh closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Tien L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Serve advantage — Tien L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mchugh A.Tien L.
—
Serve
32
—
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Tien L.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mchugh A.Tien L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
90
Break points saved·Dominant
72
97
Break points won·Dominant
5
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
49
100
Tiebreaks·Dominant
11
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tien L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.9
Surface form
7.9
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mchugh A.Tien L.
Freshness·
—
89

Tien L.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63