Kenta Miyoshi vs Aidan Mchugh — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
JPN
Kenta Miyoshi
#764ATP
1476ELO
1447Hard ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
GBR
Aidan Mchugh
#460ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Miyoshi K.
2-6 7-6 7-5
Mchugh A.
Miyoshi K.
27772
Mchugh A.
66451

Kenta Miyoshi defeated Aidan Mchugh 2-6 7-6 7-5 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Aidan Mchugh came in ranked #460, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Miyoshi K.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Mchugh A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Miyoshi K.

Serve advantage — Miyoshi K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Miyoshi K.Mchugh A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (27 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Miyoshi K.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mchugh A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
1.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63