Strong Kirchheimer vs Tyler Zink — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Strong Kirchheimer
USA
Strong Kirchheimer
#660ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Kirchheimer S.
5-7 7-5 7-5
Zink T.
Kirchheimer S.
5772
Zink T.
7551

Strong Kirchheimer defeated Tyler Zink 5-7 7-5 7-5 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kirchheimer S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kirchheimer S.Zink T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kirchheimer S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zink T.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
3.4
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kirchheimer S.Zink T.
Freshness·Slight edge
78
87

Kirchheimer S.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Zink T.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63