Ethan Quinn vs Hady Habib — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
LIB
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1364Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Quinn E.
6-4 6-4
Habib H.
Quinn E.
662
Habib H.
440

Ethan Quinn defeated Hady Habib 6-4 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Ethan Quinn edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Quinn E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Habib H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Quinn E.Habib H.
37
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Quinn E.Habib H.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Quinn E.Habib H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
44
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Clear edge
19
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
56
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Quinn E.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Habib H.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+403 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1364
10.0Overall Elo 1804
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1412
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Quinn E.Habib H.
Freshness·
94
—

Quinn E.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63