Hady Habib vs Toby Alex Kodat — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LIB
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1364Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
USA
Toby Alex Kodat
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
Habib H.
4-6 6-2 7-5
Kodat T.
Habib H.
4672
Kodat T.
6251

Hady Habib defeated Toby Alex Kodat 4-6 6-2 7-5 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Habib H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kodat T.

Kodat T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Habib H.Kodat T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Habib H.Kodat T.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
40
Break points saved·Dominant
92
40
Break points won·Clear edge
1
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
89
Tiebreaks·
78
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Habib H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kodat T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
4.3
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63