Govind Nanda vs Christopher Eubanks — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
USA2
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Nanda G.
3-6 6-2 6-3
Eubanks C.
Nanda G.
3662
Eubanks C.
6231

Govind Nanda defeated Christopher Eubanks 3-6 6-2 6-3 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nanda G.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Eubanks C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nanda G.Eubanks C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
10.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nanda G.Eubanks C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
5
50
Break points saved·Dominant
38
96
Break points won·Clear edge
22
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
67
Tiebreaks·
—
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nanda G.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Eubanks C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
8.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
4.2
7.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63