Micah Braswell vs Beibit Zhukayev — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Micah Braswell
#969ATP
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
KAZ8
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Braswell M.
3-6 6-3 7-6
Zhukayev B.
Braswell M.
36772
Zhukayev B.
63641

Micah Braswell defeated Beibit Zhukayev 3-6 6-3 7-6 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Beibit Zhukayev came in ranked #387, defending last year's round of 16, but Micah Braswell had arrived on a 3-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Braswell M.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Braswell M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Braswell M.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Braswell M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhukayev B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.9
Surface form
3.9
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63