Tyler Bowers vs Karlis Ozolins — Champaign CH Qualifying Round 1

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA
Tyler Bowers
#1884ATP
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
LAT9
Karlis Ozolins
#623ATP
24 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWLWLW
Bowers T.
6-3 7-5
Ozolins K.
Bowers T.
672
Ozolins K.
350

Tyler Bowers defeated Karlis Ozolins 6-3 7-5 in the Champaign CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Karlis Ozolins came in ranked #623, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tyler Bowers closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bowers T.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ozolins K.

Ozolins K.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bowers T.

Serve advantage — Ozolins K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Bowers T.Ozolins K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
59%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
60%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Dominant
59%
0%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
7.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (1 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bowers T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ozolins K.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 364 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.7
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Borisiouk M.[11]
Smith K.[1]
6-46-2
Braswell M.[2]
Weightman O.
6-46-1
Rybakov A.[3]
Vialla Z.
6-36-4
Corwin F.[4]
Bowers T.
6-36-746-2
Clark E.[12]
Okonkwo O.
2-67-56-3
Kirchheimer S.[6]
Hilderbrand T.[10]
6-16-4
Q1
Weightman O.
Vandecasteele Q.[7]
7-56-2
Bowers T.
Ozolins K.[9]
6-37-5
Smith K.[1]
Horve L.
6-26-0
Borisiouk M.[11]
Chaiyarin C.
6-16-4
Braswell M.[2]
King E.
7-56-3
Rybakov A.[3]
Van Orderlain D.
6-37-62
Vialla Z.
Neff A.[8]
6-23-66-3
Corwin F.[4]
Debru M.
7-53-66-4
Okonkwo O.
Svajda T.[5]
6-47-5
Clark E.[12]
Guzauskas G.
6-11-66-1
Kirchheimer S.[6]
Stalder R.
6-36-4
Hilderbrand T.[10]
Markov V.
6-16-2