Nishesh Basavareddy vs Martin Borisiouk — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA5
Nishesh Basavareddy
#142ATP
1722ELO
1681Hard ELO
$365kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
21 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 November 2024
hard
BLR
Martin Borisiouk
#1216ATP
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLL
Basavareddy N.
6-3 6-1
Borisiouk M.
Basavareddy N.
662
Borisiouk M.
310

Nishesh Basavareddy defeated Martin Borisiouk 6-3 6-1 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Nishesh Basavareddy came in ranked #142.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basavareddy N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Borisiouk M.

Borisiouk M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Basavareddy N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Basavareddy N.Borisiouk M.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Basavareddy N.Borisiouk M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.4
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 8). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basavareddy N.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Borisiouk M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.
Basavareddy N.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Miyoshi K.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Quinn E.
Braswell M.
6-26-3
Miyoshi K.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-636-2
Spizzirri E.
Kypson P.[6]
6-46-3
Basavareddy N.[5]
Nanda G.
6-26-4
R16
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Quinn E.
Habib H.
6-46-4
Miyoshi K.
Mchugh A.
2-67-647-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Maloney P.
6-26-4
Kypson P.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Spizzirri E.
Clarke J.
4-67-56-2
Basavareddy N.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Nanda G.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-66-26-3
R32
Nanda G.
Mroz W.
6-46-4
Quinn E.
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Habib H.
Kodat T.
4-66-27-5
Braswell M.
Zhang J.
5-76-36-2
Zhukayev B.[8]
Searle H.
6-37-64
Mchugh A.
Tien L.[3]
6-24-67-5
Miyoshi K.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-2
Maloney P.
Lavagno E.
6-26-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Lajal M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Kypson P.[6]
Kozlov S.
1-67-636-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zink T.
5-77-57-5
Clarke J.
Corwin F.
6-07-64
Spizzirri E.
Krueger M.[4]
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[5]
Borisiouk M.
6-36-1
Rybakov A.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-47-63