Emilio Nava vs Alibek Kachmazov — Helsinki CH Round of 32

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2024
hard
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#782ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Nava E.
6-1 6-2
Kachmazov A.
Nava E.
662
Kachmazov A.
120

Emilio Nava defeated Alibek Kachmazov 6-1 6-2 in the Helsinki CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Kachmazov A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Kachmazov A.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Kachmazov A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.8
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Kachmazov A.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
82
Break points won·Even
17
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
61
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Kachmazov A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+155 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1467
7.6Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1490
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
7.2
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
0.2
0.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Kachmazov A.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishikori K.
Nardi L.[5]
3-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Nishikori K.
Rehberg M.
6-46-766-2
Nardi L.[5]
Yevseyev D.
2-66-37-64
Quarter-finals
Rehberg M.
Squire H.
7-657-65
Nishikori K.
Fearnley J.[4]
6-46-3
Yevseyev D.
Virtanen O.[3]
6-47-5
Nardi L.[5]
Choinski J.
6-46-3
R16
Nardi L.[5]
Holmgren A.
7-667-62
Squire H.
Pellegrino A.
7-56-4
Rehberg M.
Marterer M.[8]
7-656-4
Fearnley J.[4]
Nava E.
6-46-3
Nishikori K.
Kym J.[7]
6-31-66-2
Yevseyev D.
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-4
Virtanen O.[3]
Kaukovalta P.
6-36-2
Choinski J.
Fonseca J.
0-66-16-2
R32
Nardi L.[5]
Oliveira G.
6-30-0
Squire H.
Berankis R.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Gautier A.
6-36-1
Rehberg M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-41-66-3
Marterer M.[8]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-3
Fearnley J.[4]
Royer V.
6-26-3
Nava E.
Kachmazov A.
6-16-2
Nishikori K.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-2
Kym J.[7]
Shelbayh A.
6-26-1
Arnaboldi F.
Kukushkin M.[6]
6-47-5
Yevseyev D.
Ojakaar O.
6-26-4
Kaukovalta P.
Paldanius O.
6-34-67-66
Virtanen O.[3]
Molleker R.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.
Butvilas E.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Kopp S.
6-26-1
Fonseca J.
Sels J.
6-26-3