Mark Lajal vs Paul Jubb — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2024
hard
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Lajal M.
6-3 7-5
Jubb P.
Lajal M.
672
Jubb P.
350

Mark Lajal defeated Paul Jubb 6-3 7-5 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mark Lajal closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.7
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lajal M.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
43
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
84
Break points won·Slight edge
13
6
Deciding sets·Even
42
44
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+153 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1403
6.9Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
5.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.6
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Jubb P.
Freshness·Clear edge
88
100

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.[2]
Tien L.[3]
7-57-69
Semi-finals
Tien L.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[2]
Monday J.
7-654-67-61
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[3]
Clarke J.
6-786-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
6-37-63
Monday J.
Trotter J.
6-47-62
Eubanks C.[2]
Spizzirri E.
5-76-37-65
R16
Clarke J.
Tomic B.
4-66-37-5
Tien L.[3]
Braswell M.
4-66-27-61
Lajal M.
Holt B.
6-47-65
Basavareddy N.
Svajda Z.[5]
6-46-0
Monday J.
Kypson P.[6]
3-66-37-67
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[4]
7-56-2
Spizzirri E.
Sell K.
3-67-56-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Cassone M.
6-22-66-3
R32
Krueger M.[4]
Kudla D.
6-41-0
Sell K.
Mitsui S.
6-06-1
Holt B.
Walton A.[1]
6-46-3
Lajal M.
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Basavareddy N.
Smith C.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[5]
Quinn E.
3-66-37-5
Tien L.[3]
Wiskandt M.
6-46-2
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.
7-56-4
Tomic B.
Kodat T.
7-57-5
Clarke J.
Popko D.[8]
6-32-67-60
Kypson P.[6]
Kotzen A.
3-66-37-67
Monday J.
Mejia N.
3-66-46-3
Trotter J.
Miyoshi K.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.
Ficovich J.[7]
3-66-36-3
Cassone M.
Dostanic S.
6-32-66-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-1