Brandon Holt vs Adam Walton — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2024
hard
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Holt B.
6-4 6-3
Walton A.
Holt B.
662
Walton A.
430

Brandon Holt defeated Adam Walton 6-4 6-3 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard. Brandon Holt extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-22MallorcaQ1grassBrandon Holt6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(0)

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Holt B.Walton A.
—
Serve
35
—
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Walton A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.8
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
65
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
95
Break points won·Slight edge
31
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
95
Tiebreaks·Even
69
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Walton A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1507
Surface ELO
6.6+162 Hard Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1703
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
7.6
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
4.9
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Walton A.
Freshness·
—
54

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.[2]
Tien L.[3]
7-57-69
Semi-finals
Tien L.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[2]
Monday J.
7-654-67-61
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[3]
Clarke J.
6-786-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
6-37-63
Monday J.
Trotter J.
6-47-62
Eubanks C.[2]
Spizzirri E.
5-76-37-65
R16
Clarke J.
Tomic B.
4-66-37-5
Tien L.[3]
Braswell M.
4-66-27-61
Lajal M.
Holt B.
6-47-65
Basavareddy N.
Svajda Z.[5]
6-46-0
Monday J.
Kypson P.[6]
3-66-37-67
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[4]
7-56-2
Spizzirri E.
Sell K.
3-67-56-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Cassone M.
6-22-66-3
R32
Krueger M.[4]
Kudla D.
6-41-0
Sell K.
Mitsui S.
6-06-1
Holt B.
Walton A.[1]
6-46-3
Lajal M.
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Basavareddy N.
Smith C.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[5]
Quinn E.
3-66-37-5
Tien L.[3]
Wiskandt M.
6-46-2
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.
7-56-4
Tomic B.
Kodat T.
7-57-5
Clarke J.
Popko D.[8]
6-32-67-60
Kypson P.[6]
Kotzen A.
3-66-37-67
Monday J.
Mejia N.
3-66-46-3
Trotter J.
Miyoshi K.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.
Ficovich J.[7]
3-66-36-3
Cassone M.
Dostanic S.
6-32-66-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-1