Learner Tien vs Jay Clarke — Knoxville CH Quarter-final

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Learner Tien
USA3
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 November 2024
hard
GBR
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1421Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLW
Tien L.
6-7 6-3 6-2
Clarke J.
Tien L.
68662
Clarke J.
710321

Learner Tien defeated Jay Clarke 6-7 6-3 6-2 in the Knoxville CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Clarke J.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
8
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Dominant
83
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
8.3
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Clarke J.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
10.0+484 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1421
10.0Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1458
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.3
Surface form
5.2
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Clarke J.
Freshness·
95
—

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.[2]
Tien L.[3]
7-57-69
Semi-finals
Tien L.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[2]
Monday J.
7-654-67-61
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[3]
Clarke J.
6-786-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Lajal M.
6-37-63
Monday J.
Trotter J.
6-47-62
Eubanks C.[2]
Spizzirri E.
5-76-37-65
R16
Clarke J.
Tomic B.
4-66-37-5
Tien L.[3]
Braswell M.
4-66-27-61
Lajal M.
Holt B.
6-47-65
Basavareddy N.
Svajda Z.[5]
6-46-0
Monday J.
Kypson P.[6]
3-66-37-67
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[4]
7-56-2
Spizzirri E.
Sell K.
3-67-56-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Cassone M.
6-22-66-3
R32
Krueger M.[4]
Kudla D.
6-41-0
Sell K.
Mitsui S.
6-06-1
Holt B.
Walton A.[1]
6-46-3
Lajal M.
Jubb P.
6-37-5
Basavareddy N.
Smith C.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[5]
Quinn E.
3-66-37-5
Tien L.[3]
Wiskandt M.
6-46-2
Braswell M.
Zhukayev B.
7-56-4
Tomic B.
Kodat T.
7-57-5
Clarke J.
Popko D.[8]
6-32-67-60
Kypson P.[6]
Kotzen A.
3-66-37-67
Monday J.
Mejia N.
3-66-46-3
Trotter J.
Miyoshi K.
6-46-4
Spizzirri E.
Ficovich J.[7]
3-66-36-3
Cassone M.
Dostanic S.
6-32-66-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-1