James Trotter vs Colton Smith — Charlottesville CH Quarter-final

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
USA
Colton Smith
#181ATP
1577ELO
1566Hard ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
Trotter J.
7-6 2-6 7-6
Smith C.
Trotter J.
772772
Smith C.
646641

James Trotter defeated Colton Smith 7-6 2-6 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: James Trotter closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trotter J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Smith C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trotter J.Smith C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trotter J.Smith C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
62
Break points saved·Even
90
94
Break points won·Dominant
2
52
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
92
Tiebreaks·Even
7
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trotter J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Smith C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1380
Surface ELO
6.5+185 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1414
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1577
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
4.3
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trotter J.Smith C.
Freshness·Dominant
75
100

Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d) · Smith C.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Tien L.[2]
6-33-66-2
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Rodesch C.
6-46-767-65
Galarneau A.
Quinn E.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Smith C.
7-642-67-64
Tien L.[2]
Lajal M.
3-66-16-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zahraj P.
6-26-0
Rodesch C.
Jubb P.[8]
6-777-56-4
Galarneau A.
Dietrich D.
6-27-65
Quinn E.
Kasnikowski M.[5]
7-56-0
Smith C.
Opelka R.
6-756-46-4
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Kypson P.[6]
7-646-3
Tien L.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-68
R32
Kasnikowski M.[5]
Edmund K.
4-66-46-2
Zahraj P.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-17-67
Basavareddy N.
Spizzirri E.
6-46-3
Rodesch C.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[8]
Kodat T.
6-46-2
Dietrich D.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Couacaud E.
6-17-67
Opelka R.
Popko D.[7]
5-76-17-61
Smith C.
Ilagan A.
6-37-5
Holt B.
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[3]
7-57-66
Kypson P.[6]
Tomic B.
6-36-0
Lajal M.
Searle H.
6-36-3
Mejia N.
Kudla D.
0-66-37-5
Tien L.[2]
Zhukayev B.
2-66-46-2