Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard vs Frances Tiafoe — Paris Masters Round of 64

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
FRA
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
#83ATP
1738ELO
1672Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$3.5MCAREER
23 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
Frances Tiafoe
USA14
Frances Tiafoe
#19ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Tiafoe F.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
657762
Tiafoe F.
776431

Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard defeated Frances Tiafoe 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the Paris Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #19, defending last year's round of 64, but Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard had arrived on a 5-match winning run. Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-12-30BrisbaneR16hardGiovanni Mpetshi Perricard6-4 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Mpetshi Perricard G.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Tiafoe F.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Mpetshi Perricard G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mpetshi Perricard G.Tiafoe F.
81
Serve
38
0
Return
37

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mpetshi Perricard G.Tiafoe F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
29%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
16.1
7.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mpetshi Perricard G.Tiafoe F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
83
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Dominant
1
57
Deciding sets·Even
95
92
Tiebreaks·Even
97
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tiafoe F.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1672
Surface ELO
7.3+190 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1738
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1918
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
4.8
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
4.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
4.0
Country comfort
4.4
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mpetshi Perricard G.Tiafoe F.
Freshness·Clear edge
94
72

Mpetshi Perricard G.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tiafoe F.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 55 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
14°COvercast
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 92%
Final
Zverev A.[3]
Humbert U.[15]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[15]
Khachanov K.
6-766-46-3
Zverev A.[3]
Rune H.[13]
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Rune H.[13]
De Minaur A.[9]
6-44-67-5
Khachanov K.
Dimitrov G.[8]
6-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Tsitsipas S.[10]
7-56-4
Humbert U.[15]
Thompson J.
6-27-64
R16
Humbert U.[15]
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-13-67-5
Rune H.[13]
Cazaux A.
3-66-36-4
De Minaur A.[9]
Draper J.
5-76-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Fils A.
6-43-66-3
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Cerundolo F.
6-716-46-2
Dimitrov G.[8]
Rinderknech A.
6-24-67-65
Khachanov K.
Popyrin A.
7-656-4
Thompson J.
Mannarino A.
7-57-65
R32
Fils A.
Struff J.
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Tabilo A.
6-36-4
Thompson J.
Ruud C.[7]
7-633-66-4
Rinderknech A.
Michelsen A.
7-667-67
Draper J.
Fritz T.[5]
7-664-66-4
Zverev A.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-626-3
Cerundolo F.
Rublev A.[6]
7-667-65
Dimitrov G.[8]
Etcheverry T.
6-796-37-5
Khachanov K.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-7126-16-4
De Minaur A.[9]
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-65
Mannarino A.
Bergs Z.
3-66-26-4
Humbert U.[15]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Alcaraz C.[2]
Jarry N.
7-56-1
Popyrin A.
Medvedev D.[4]
6-42-67-64
Cazaux A.
Shelton B.
6-37-64
Rune H.[13]
Bublik A.
6-46-2
R64
De Minaur A.[9]
Navone M.
7-56-1
Struff J.
Musetti L.[16]
6-46-2
Etcheverry T.
Zhang Z.
6-37-66
Khachanov K.
Oconnell C.
6-43-67-66
Giron M.
Shang J.
7-667-66
Rinderknech A.
Machac T.
6-735-3
Michelsen A.
Hurkacz H.[12]
6-16-3
Tabilo A.
Borges N.
3-67-656-3
Draper J.
Lehecka J.
7-56-2
Fils A.
Cilic M.
7-656-4
Kecmanovic M.
Baez S.
6-46-767-5
Griekspoor T.
Darderi L.
6-36-4
Bublik A.
Fognini F.
7-57-5
Rune H.[13]
Arnaldi M.
6-46-4
Thompson J.
Martinez P.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Mannarino A.
Paul T.[11]
6-37-5
Humbert U.[15]
Nakashima B.
6-34-66-4
Jarry N.
Sonego L.
7-646-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Tiafoe F.[14]
6-757-646-3
Cerundolo F.
Halys Q.
7-656-3
Shelton B.
Moutet C.
6-36-786-3
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Carballes Baena R.
4-66-36-3
Popyrin A.
Berrettini M.
7-57-62