Chris Rodesch vs Govind Nanda — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LUX
Chris Rodesch
#191ATP
1622ELO
1623Hard ELO
$163kYTD
$424kCAREER
24 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
Rodesch C.
6-4 6-3
Nanda G.
Rodesch C.
662
Nanda G.
430

Chris Rodesch defeated Govind Nanda 6-4 6-3 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Chris Rodesch came in ranked #191, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Chris Rodesch closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodesch C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Nanda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rodesch C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodesch C.Nanda G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodesch C.Nanda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
5
Break points saved·Dominant
87
38
Break points won·Clear edge
5
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
15
Tiebreaks·
74
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodesch C.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 44 days (−0.7)
Nanda G.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rodesch C.Nanda G.
Freshness·
100
—

Rodesch C.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Tien L.[2]
6-33-66-2
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Rodesch C.
6-46-767-65
Galarneau A.
Quinn E.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Smith C.
7-642-67-64
Tien L.[2]
Lajal M.
3-66-16-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zahraj P.
6-26-0
Rodesch C.
Jubb P.[8]
6-777-56-4
Galarneau A.
Dietrich D.
6-27-65
Quinn E.
Kasnikowski M.[5]
7-56-0
Smith C.
Opelka R.
6-756-46-4
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Kypson P.[6]
7-646-3
Tien L.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-68
R32
Kasnikowski M.[5]
Edmund K.
4-66-46-2
Zahraj P.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-17-67
Basavareddy N.
Spizzirri E.
6-46-3
Rodesch C.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[8]
Kodat T.
6-46-2
Dietrich D.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Couacaud E.
6-17-67
Opelka R.
Popko D.[7]
5-76-17-61
Smith C.
Ilagan A.
6-37-5
Holt B.
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[3]
7-57-66
Kypson P.[6]
Tomic B.
6-36-0
Lajal M.
Searle H.
6-36-3
Mejia N.
Kudla D.
0-66-37-5
Tien L.[2]
Zhukayev B.
2-66-46-2