Learner Tien vs Nicolas Mejia — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Learner Tien
USA2
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
Nicolas Mejia
COL
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1424Hard ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Tien L.
6-4 7-6
Mejia N.
Tien L.
67102
Mejia N.
4680

Learner Tien defeated Nicolas Mejia 6-4 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Mejia N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Mejia N.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Mejia N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Mejia N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
74
Break points won·Dominant
83
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
8.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mejia N.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+481 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1424
9.5Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1477
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.2
Surface form
5.2
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.1
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Mejia N.
Freshness·Dominant
95
55

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mejia N.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Tien L.[2]
6-33-66-2
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Rodesch C.
6-46-767-65
Galarneau A.
Quinn E.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Smith C.
7-642-67-64
Tien L.[2]
Lajal M.
3-66-16-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zahraj P.
6-26-0
Rodesch C.
Jubb P.[8]
6-777-56-4
Galarneau A.
Dietrich D.
6-27-65
Quinn E.
Kasnikowski M.[5]
7-56-0
Smith C.
Opelka R.
6-756-46-4
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Kypson P.[6]
7-646-3
Tien L.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-68
R32
Kasnikowski M.[5]
Edmund K.
4-66-46-2
Zahraj P.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-17-67
Basavareddy N.
Spizzirri E.
6-46-3
Rodesch C.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[8]
Kodat T.
6-46-2
Dietrich D.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Couacaud E.
6-17-67
Opelka R.
Popko D.[7]
5-76-17-61
Smith C.
Ilagan A.
6-37-5
Holt B.
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[3]
7-57-66
Kypson P.[6]
Tomic B.
6-36-0
Lajal M.
Searle H.
6-36-3
Mejia N.
Kudla D.
0-66-37-5
Tien L.[2]
Zhukayev B.
2-66-46-2